Sections

Weather Forecast

Close
Advertisement

N.D. should be a key part to national energy strategy

Email Sign up for Breaking News Alerts
opinion Jamestown,North Dakota 58401 http://www.jamestownsun.com/sites/all/themes/jamestownsun_theme/images/social_default_image.png
Jamestown Sun
701-251-2873 customer support
N.D. should be a key part to national energy strategy
Jamestown North Dakota 121 3rd St NW 58401

To truly talk about a national energy strategy for our country, we should look to North Dakota.

And this past week, we did.

U.S. Energy Secretary Ernest Moniz and other top administration officials held a meeting Friday in Bismarck to hear from elected officials, experts, academics and the general public about energy infrastructure, particularly from the Bakken. But it almost did not happen.

Advertisement
Advertisement

Starting in April, the U.S. Department of Energy began holding meetings across the country as it works to develop a national energy strategy. The meetings specifically focus on our infrastructure for transporting, transmitting and delivering energy with the goal of better providing affordable, clean and reliable energy to Americans.

Surprisingly, when the U.S. Department of Energy first released the locations it would visit, North Dakota was not on the list. In February, I reached out to Moniz to explain why North Dakota must be included.

We are the second-;argest oil producer in the country. We are a leader in natural gas, wind energy and biofuels production. And we are a strong coal producer, with nearly 80 percent of our state using it to heat and light our homes.

It only makes sense that North Dakota should be a key part of any discussion about the direction of our country’s energy strategy. And after speaking with him, Moniz agreed.

As I’ve said many times, we can’t talk about a national energy policy without talking about energy infrastructure and transportation. At the meeting we talked about workforce development, infrastructure constraints in the Bakken and ideas to address them, and suggestions to respond to the changing energy infrastructure needs in the state. It was a needed and worthwhile discussion.

While Moniz was in North Dakota, I also brought him to the one-of-a-kind Dakota Gasification Co. synfuels facility in Beulah — a clean coal facility I know well from my more than 10 years working there. It was the first time in 20 years that an energy secretary visited Dakota Gasification. Moniz has suggested an openness to making sure the U.S. uses a diverse array of energy sources, including a discussion on clean coal that I invited him to attend in June. His visit to Dakota Gasification reinforced a willingness to continue this important conversation.

We then visited Hess Corp.’s natural gas plant in Tioga, N.D. In North Dakota, our energy companies aren’t just developing resources, they are also working to make our energy technology even better. Hess is one of those companies as its recent expansion should reduce flaring at its Bakken operations by 5 to 10 percent — a worthy investment.

I have a long history with energy development in North Dakota, going back to my time serving as tax commissioner, sitting on the industrial commission as our state’s attorney general and serving on the board at Dakota Gasification. Since joining the U.S. Senate, that story has only continued, and I’m fighting for my bill to find a realistic path forward for coal by incentivizing companies to invest in clean coal technology.

The meeting in Bismarck was another milestone. By working together, we can build a true all-of-the-above energy strategy, just like North Dakota is doing.

(Heitkamp is one of two senators representing North Dakota in Washington)

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
randomness